International Project Management Association (IPMA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the International Project Management Association (IPMA) Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions; each question includes hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


How does the concept of 'monitoring and control' fit into risk management?

  1. It involves identifying risks only

  2. It evaluates project completion rates

  3. It ensures ongoing assessment and response to risks

  4. It ranks project importance

The correct answer is: It ensures ongoing assessment and response to risks

The concept of 'monitoring and control' in risk management is primarily focused on ensuring that ongoing assessment and response to risks are effectively managed throughout the project lifecycle. This involves continuously tracking identified risks, as well as new risks that may arise, and evaluating their potential impact on project objectives. By actively monitoring risks, project managers can assess the effectiveness of risk responses and make necessary adjustments to mitigation strategies as conditions change. This process allows for dynamic response to risks, as it emphasizes the importance of not only having risk management plans in place but also regularly updating and refining those plans based on current project status and emerging challenges. By maintaining this proactive approach, project teams can minimize the likelihood of risks materializing and mitigate their potential impact. The other options focus on different aspects of project management that do not align with the core purpose of monitoring and control in risk management. For example, identifying risks is only the initial step in risk management, and evaluating project completion rates pertains more to overall project tracking rather than specific risk responses. Additionally, ranking project importance relates to prioritization rather than the ongoing management of risk dynamics.